Instytut Nafty i Gazu - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy

Nafta-Gaz – Articles – edition 2020 / February

 

	Table of contents edition 2020 / February
	Modelowanie 1D procesów generowania węglowodorów z warstw istebniańskich w profilu odwiertu nawiercającego utwory jednostki śląskiej 1D modelling of hydrocarbon generation from the Istebna Beds in borehole profile from the Silesian Unit Karol Spunda Instytut Nafty i Gazu – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
	Ewaluacja sweet spotów w polskich formacjach łupkowych w odniesieniu do wybranych parametrów geochemicznych Evaluation of sweet spots in Polish shale formations in relation to the selected geochemical parameters Irena Matyasik, Marek Janiga, Karol Spunda Instytut Nafty i Gazu – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
	Zaczyny cementowe od uszczelniania otworów wiertniczych na Niżu Polskim w trudnych warunkach geologiczno-technicznych Cement slurries for sealing boreholes in the Polish Lowlands in difficult geological and technical conditions Marcin Rzepka, Miłosz Kędzierski Instytut Nafty i Gazu – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
	Zaczyny do uszczelniania otworów w warunkach niskich wartości gradientów ciśnienia szczelinowania skał oraz do prac rekonstrukcyjnych Cement slurries for sealing boreholes in conditions of low pressure gradients of rock fracturing and for workover jobs or operations Marcin Kremieniewski Instytut Nafty i Gazu – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
	Możliwości zastosowania nanorurek węglowych (CNTs) w technologii zaczynów cementowych The possibility of using carbon nanotubes in cement slurries technology Miłosz Kędzierski, Marcin Rzepka, Marcin Kremieniewski Instytut Nafty i Gazu – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
	Internet of Things (IoT) – LoRaWAN w praktyce Internet of Things (IoT) – LoRaWAN in practice Tomasz Lipka Instytut Nafty i Gazu – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
	Potencjał użytkowo-eksploatacyjny butanolu jako paliwa alternatywnego do zasilania silników ZI Utility-exploitation potential of butanol as an alternative fuel designed for car SI engines Zbigniew Stępień Instytut Nafty i Gazu – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy

Nafta-Gaz – Articles – edition 2020 / FebruaryTable of contents edition 2020 / February

Nafta-Gaz – Articles – edition 2020 / August

 

	Table of contents edition 2020 / August
	Zastosowanie wskaźnika TAI (thermal alteration index) i analizy palinofacjalnej do określenia stopnia dojrzałości termicznej materii organicznej w utworach górnego permu i triasu w północnej części niecki nidziańskiej (Polska centralna) Application of the TAI (Thermal Alteration Index) and palynofacial analysis for determining the degree of organic matter termal maturity in the Upper Permian and Triassic deposits in the northern part of the Nida Basin (central Poland) Anna Fijałkowska-Mader Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Oddział Świętokrzyski
	Petrofizyczne aspekty poszukiwań naftowych na dużych głębokościach Petrophysical aspects of hydrocarbon prospecting and exploitation in deeper targets Piotr Such Instytut Nafty i Gazu – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
	Study on bioremediation of soil contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) Badania bioremediacji gleby zanieczyszczonej polichlorowanymi bifenylami (PCBs) Katarzyna Wojtowicz, Teresa Steliga Oil and Gas Institute – National Research Institute
	Badania nad opracowaniem hybrydowej cieczy buforowej Research into the development of a hybrid spacer Marcin Kremieniewski, Miłosz Kędzierski Instytut Nafty i Gazu – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
	Wprowadzenie do oceny śladu środowiskowego dla sektora produkcji ropy naftowej i gazu ziemnego Introduction to the evaluation of the environmental footprint for the oil and natural gas production sector Joanna Niemczewska, Joanna Zaleska-Bartosz Instytut Nafty i Gazu – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
	Wpływ kompatybilności rop na depozycję osadów w łańcuchu dystrybucji ropy naftowej The effect of oil compatibility on sediments deposition in the crude oil distribution chain Sławomir Szuflita, Wojciech Krasodomski, Jerzy Kuśnierczyk, Mirosław Wojnicki, Marcin Warnecki Instytut Nafty i Gazu – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
	Problematyka wyznaczenia precyzji metody oznaczania zawartości siarki w LPG według EN 17178:2019 w warunkach laboratorium INiG – PIB The issue of determining the precision of the method of determining sulfur content in LPG according to EN 17178: 2019 in the conditions of the INiG – PIB laboratory Sylwia Jędrychowska Instytut Nafty i Gazu – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
	Standaryzacja informacji marketingowo-technicznych na etykietach olejów silnikowych w świetle badań ankietowych Standardisation of marketing and technical information on motor oil labels in the light of surveys Piotr Niemiec Uniwersytet Łódzki

The primary responsibility of the reviewer is an objective evaluation of the text. All comments, evaluations and suggestions should be indicated clearly and supported by appropriate arguments. Criticism or remarks for personal reasons are unacceptable. Decision to publish is influenced only by the substantive content of the material submitted to the reviewer and its thematic consistency with the profile of the „Nafta-Gaz” monthly journal.
In the review process, only the following criteria are taken into account:

•      the originality of the work and its scientific character,
•      compliance of the submitted manuscript with the thematic scope of the „Nafta-Gaz” monthly journal - correctness of calculations and terminology used,
•      correct verification of hypotheses and justification of applications.

 

Rights
1. The reviewer has the right of abstention at any stage of the work related to the performed task, reviewing the given article.
2. The reviewer has the right to choose the form of material delivery for review (paper printout, electronic version: editable file in * .doc, * .docx format or in * .pdf format). The Reviewer should inform the Editorial Board about the form chosen.
More information on the reviewer's tasks and text review procedure can be found here: Publication Ethics Statement PROCEDURE FOR REVIEWING Nafta-Gaz

Obligations
1. The reviewer is obliged to inform the editors about abstention from reviewing a given article
2. The reviewer is obliged to comply with the ethics policy of the Publishing House in the scope of his task.

 

1. Choosing of the reviewer

• At least two independent reviewers are appointed to evaluate each publication.
• Reviewers of the publication accepted for the editorial process are appointed by the Editorial Committee.
• When selecting a reviewer for a given publication, the Editorial Committee directs it to the person most competent in a given field - taking into account the knowledge and scientific achievements of that person and his/her reputation as a reliable reviewer.
• If there are not many specialists in a given field of science in Poland, the Editorial Committee directs the publication to foreign reviewers.
• If there are strong substantive and / or institutional disputes in a given field that may be related to the topic of the reviewed article or the activity of the person being assessed, the Editor-in-Chief will make every effort to ensure that these disputes do not translate into biased review procedures.
• The names of reviewers of individual publications will not be disclosed, while once a year, the Editorial Committee of the monthly journal „Nafta-Gaz” will make public the list of cooperating reviewers.

2. Conclusion of contracts for the preparation of reviews

• Entrusting the person to the preparation of the review will be confirmed by an appropriate agreement, guaranteeing the reliability and timeliness of the review.
• The review must be in written form and end with an explicit application for the article to be published or rejected.
• The Editorial Committee may not accept the review if it does not correspond to the provisions contained in the contract.
• The Editorial Committee will not accept reviews that do not meet the substantive and formal requirements of a scientific review, including partial reviews that contain non-motivated opinions and lacking a logical connection between the content and the conclusion.

3. Independence of reviewers' opinions

• The Editorial Committee guarantees the reviewer complete freedom and independence in the scope of the review.
• Before signing the contract and entrusting the article for review, the reviewer, based on a short information about the content (table of contents, introduction, summary) and the volume of the article, is obliged to notify the Editorial Committee about whether and when he/she will be able to undertake the review - however he/she has full freedom to decide whether to accept or reject the work for review.

4. No conflict of interest in the review proceedings

• The Editorial Committee will make sure that the author / authors of the reviewed article will be unaware of the identity of reviewers (single-blind review).
• The reviewer must sign a declaration of non-existence of conflict of interest, which is considered to be:

1. direct personal relationships (kinship, legal relationships, conflict),
2. professional subordination relationships,
3. direct scientific cooperation during the last two years preceding the preparation of the review.

• Derogation from the above rule is only admissible if the group of specialists in a given field is very narrow.

5. Confidentiality in reviewing procedures

• The reviewing procedure is carried out in accordance with the rules of confidentiality, however, after its completion, the reviews become public to all members of the Editorial Committee.
• The Editors provide the author of the article with the opportunity to acquaint him/herself with the comments of the reviewer in detail.
• Reviewers are required to maintain discretion regarding the information they have gained access to, as well as other information that could be subject to distortions of rumors and excitement in the scientific community.

6. Disputes in the review proceedings

• In disputable or complicated cases, or interdisciplinary work, the Editorial Committee will appoint additional reviewers.
• Receiving a majority of negative reviews will result in disqualification of the subject of the review, and if they constitute half of all the reviews obtained at a given stage or constitute a minority, but there is more than one - the Editorial Committee will appoint an additional reviewer.
• In the case of a recommendation to the author to make corrections to the submitted article, the right to its re-verification is vested in all reviewers.
• The Institute excludes the possibility of repeating proceedings related to the same or similar work if the previous procedure was unsuccessful.

7. Irregularities in reviewing procedures

• Any suspicions regarding possible irregularities or fraud will be clarified before the end of the proceedings, including the reviewing procedure.